People v. Farrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Farrell

49 A.D.2d 836, 373 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10974

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 16, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 836 (People v. Farrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Farrell, 49 A.D.2d 836, 373 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10974 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered June 4, 1974, convicting defendant, upon a jury verdict, of two counts of robbery in the first degree and possession of a weapon as a misdemeanor, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing the conviction on the weapon count and dismissing that count of the indictment and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed. Scrutiny of the record warrants concluding that the count of possession of a weapon as a misdemeanor was a lesser included concurrent count to robbery in the first degree. The remaining contentions advanced by defendant have been examined and found to be without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered June 4, 1974, convicting defendant, upon a jury verdict, of two counts of robbery in the first degree and possession of a weapon as a misdemeanor, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing the conviction on the weapon count and dismissing that count of the indictment and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed. Scrutiny of the record warrants concluding that the count of possession of a weapon as a misdemeanor was a lesser included concurrent count to robbery in the first degree. The remaining contentions advanced by defendant have been examined and found to be without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 836, 373 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-farrell-nyappdiv-1975.