People v. Faria
This text of 304 A.D.2d 838 (People v. Faria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), dated June 7, 2000, convicting her of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and tampering with physical evidence (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
[839]*839Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of depraved indifference murder (see Penal Law § 125.25 [2]) beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Sanchez, 98 NY2d 373, 378 [2002]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Adams and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
304 A.D.2d 838, 757 N.Y.S.2d 878, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-faria-nyappdiv-2003.