People v. Falsetta

101 A.D.2d 867, 476 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18562
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 21, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 A.D.2d 867 (People v. Falsetta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Falsetta, 101 A.D.2d 867, 476 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), imposed October 5,1983, upon his conviction of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon a plea of guilty, the sentence being a period of probation not to exceed five years, with a term of six months imprisonment running concurrently with the term of probation, as well as a fine of $75. II Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the term of six months’ imprisonment imposed as a concurrent condition of defendant’s probation to an intermittent term of imprisonment of four months, to be served on consecutive weekends from 8:00 a.m. Saturday until 6:00 p.m. Sunday. As so modified, sentence affirmed and matter remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, to specify the first and last dates upon which defendant is to be incarcerated under such sentence in accordance with section 85.00 (subd 4, par [a], cl [iv]) of the Penal Law and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). I At the time of the incident, defendant was 21 years old with an unblemished record and was gainfully employed. Although the probation report recommended that defendant serve a period of incarceration to impress upon him the seriousness of his behavior, the circumstances of this case coupled with the absence of any prior criminal involvement on defendant’s part mandate a reduction in the sentence imposed (see People v Shakes, 90 AD2d 800). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Mangano and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Orr
138 A.D.2d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A.D.2d 867, 476 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-falsetta-nyappdiv-1984.