People v. Falkenstein
This text of 111 A.D.2d 183 (People v. Falkenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered June 17, 1984, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of 10 to 20 years’ imprisonment.
Judgment affirmed.
Defendant agreed to a trial by the court pursuant to his signing of a written waiver of a jury trial. Following the complainant’s testimony, he interrupted the trial to enter a plea of guilty. At that time, the court informed him of the ramifications of his plea and the sentence he would receive.
Five months prior to the instant crime, on a plea of guilty to sexual abuse in the first degree, the defendant had received a probationary sentence with the provision that he attend Columbia Presbyterian Hospital for psychiatric treatment. He failed to abide by the lenient terms of his probation. In view of the defendant’s prior history, the sentence herein cannot be considered excessive. Nor was there an abuse of discretion in denying his application to withdraw his plea. We find that the other arguments raised by defendant are without merit. Titone, J. P., Mangano, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 A.D.2d 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-falkenstein-nyappdiv-1985.