People v. Faison

257 A.D.2d 629, 682 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 293
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Faison. Read the opinion of the Court — 265 A.D.2d 422

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunlop, J.), rendered September 9, 1996, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that he was denied a fair trial due to prosecutorial misconduct is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Brisbane, 244 AD2d 498). In any [630]*630event, the allegedly improper summation remarks were either a fair statement of the facts in evidence or a fair response to defense counsel’s summation remarks (see, People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit. Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Faison, 257 A.D.2d 629, 682 N.Y.S.2d 904, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 293 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

257 A.D.2d 629 (People v. Faison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ashwal
347 N.E.2d 564 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Brisbane
244 A.D.2d 498 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)