People v. Fairweather

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fairweather

201 A.D.2d 582, 609 N.Y.S.2d 807

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 582 (People v. Fairweather) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fairweather, 201 A.D.2d 582, 609 N.Y.S.2d 807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from four judgments of the County Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.), all rendered January 28, 1993, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (four counts, one as to each indictment) upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was not competent to enter pleas is unsupported by the record. Nor did the court err in failing to conduct a hearing to determine the defendant’s competence (see, CPL 730.30 [2]). The record reveals that the defendant’s pleas were knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from four judgments of the County Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.), all rendered January 28, 1993, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (four counts, one as to each indictment) upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was not competent to enter pleas is unsupported by the record. Nor did the court err in failing to conduct a hearing to determine the defendant’s competence (see, CPL 730.30 [2]). The record reveals that the defendant’s pleas were knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 582, 609 N.Y.S.2d 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fairweather-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack