People v. Fair

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fair

267 A.D.2d 246, 699 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12509

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 246 (People v. Fair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fair, 267 A.D.2d 246, 699 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12509 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), rendered September 29, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (five counts), robbery in the second degree (five counts), grand larceny in the fourth degree (five counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

[247]*247Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), rendered September 29, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (five counts), robbery in the second degree (five counts), grand larceny in the fourth degree (five counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

[247]*247Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 246, 699 N.Y.S.2d 302, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fair-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack