People v. Fagan
This text of 31 A.D.3d 783 (People v. Fagan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered November 5, 2003, convicting him of conspiracy in the second degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor impermissibly vouched for the credibility of two confidential informant witnesses who testified pursuant to cooperation agreements, or improperly bolstered their testimony, is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Robinson, 8 AD3d 502, 502-503 [2004]; People v Gibbs, 210 AD2d 4 [1994]), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Krausman, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Covello, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 A.D.3d 783, 818 N.Y.S.2d 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fagan-nyappdiv-2006.