People v. Fagan

213 A.D.2d 987, 625 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3771
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Fagan. Read the opinion of the Court — 215 A.D.2d 686

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion based on defendant’s failure to prove that statements made in the affidavit of the police officer supporting the search warrant application were knowingly false or made in reckless disregard of the truth (see, People v Tambe, 71 NY2d 492, 504; see also, Franks v Delaware, 438 US 154, 171; People v Alfinito, 16 NY2d 181, 186). We further conclude that defendant was not prejudiced by the minor inaccuracies in the affidavit and thus reversal is not required (see, People v Clarke, 173 AD2d 550). (Resubmission of Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. —Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Fallon, Doerr, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Fagan, 213 A.D.2d 987, 625 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

213 A.D.2d 987 (People v. Fagan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Franks v. Delaware
438 U.S. 154 (Supreme Court, 1978)
People v. Alfinito
211 N.E.2d 644 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)
People v. Tambe
522 N.E.2d 448 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Clarke
173 A.D.2d 550 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)