People v. Everett

180 A.D.2d 746
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Everett. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 A.D.2d 502

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Delin, J.), rendered March 14, 1986, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and to exclude to a moral certainty every reasonable hypothesis of innocence (see, People v Betancourt, 68 NY2d 707). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Eiber, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Everett, 180 A.D.2d 746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

180 A.D.2d 746 (People v. Everett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Betancourt
497 N.E.2d 677 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)