People v. Evans

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Evans

191 A.D.2d 454, 594 N.Y.S.2d 780

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 1, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 191 A.D.2d 454 (People v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Evans, 191 A.D.2d 454, 594 N.Y.S.2d 780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered March 1, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County for resentencing in accordance herewith.

Under these circumstances, where the defendant was not continuously confined during the time-period involved, the court erred in resentencing him in the absence of an updated probation report (cf., People v Kuey, 186 AD2d 684). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered March 1, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County for resentencing in accordance herewith.

Under these circumstances, where the defendant was not continuously confined during the time-period involved, the court erred in resentencing him in the absence of an updated probation report (cf., People v Kuey, 186 AD2d 684). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D.2d 454, 594 N.Y.S.2d 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-evans-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack