People v. Evans
This text of 638 N.E.2d 958 (People v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The issue whether the police acted reasonably in stopping and searching defendant is a mixed question of law and fact, and evidence exists in the record to support the hearing court’s findings as affirmed by the Appellate Division (see, People v Falciglia, 75 NY2d 935, 937; People v Castro, 68 NY2d 850, 851; People v Harrison, 57 NY2d 470).
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
638 N.E.2d 958, 83 N.Y.2d 934, 615 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1994 N.Y. LEXIS 1291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-evans-ny-1994.