People v. Evans

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Evans

165 N.W.2d 270, 14 Mich. App. 222, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 876

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 25, 1968

DocketDocket No. 3,463

StatusPublished

This text of 165 N.W.2d 270 (People v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Evans, 165 N.W.2d 270, 14 Mich. App. 222, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 876 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Pursuant to the order of this Court dated October 19, 1966, and made as a determination of the people’s motion to affirm in this case, this cause was remanded to the trial court to afford defendant the opportunity of filing a motion for new trial and for a Walker hearing. Such motion was made and heard below. By written opinion dated February 20, 1967, the trial judge found that none of the questions raised as basis for new trial and Walker hearing had been preserved at trial and denied the motion. Defendant appeals from that denial and from his conviction and sentence.

[223]*223A review of the record discloses that no question raised on appeal was saved for review.

Affirmed.

Quinn, P. J., and T. G-. Kavanagh and Cobkin, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Pursuant to the order of this Court dated October 19, 1966, and made as a determination of the people’s motion to affirm in this case, this cause was remanded to the trial court to afford defendant the opportunity of filing a motion for new trial and for a Walker hearing. Such motion was made and heard below. By written opinion dated February 20, 1967, the trial judge found that none of the questions raised as basis for new trial and Walker hearing had been preserved at trial and denied the motion. Defendant appeals from that denial and from his conviction and sentence.

[223]*223A review of the record discloses that no question raised on appeal was saved for review.

Affirmed.

Quinn, P. J., and T. G-. Kavanagh and Cobkin, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 N.W.2d 270, 14 Mich. App. 222, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-evans-michctapp-1968.