People v. Eustace

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Eustace

269 A.D.2d 230, 702 N.Y.S.2d 815, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1521

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D.2d 230 (People v. Eustace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Eustace, 269 A.D.2d 230, 702 N.Y.S.2d 815, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Fisch, J.), rendered January 15, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, rape in the second degree (3 counts) and sodomy on the second degree (3 counts) and sentencing him to an aggregate term of lSVs to 46 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and evaluation of expert testimony.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Wallach, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Fisch, J.), rendered January 15, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, rape in the second degree (3 counts) and sodomy on the second degree (3 counts) and sentencing him to an aggregate term of lSVs to 46 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and evaluation of expert testimony.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Wallach, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D.2d 230, 702 N.Y.S.2d 815, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-eustace-nyappdiv-2000.