People v. Etson
This text of 355 N.E.2d 296 (People v. Etson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant did not, either at the sentencing hearing or on any other occasion, claim that he aided any prosecution efforts and, indeed, there is no such evidence. Hence, he may not obtain relief under the ameliorative provisions of paragraph (b) of subdivision 1 of section 65.00 of the Penal Law. In any event, any such claim would prove unavailing (People v Eason, 40 NY2d 297 [decided herewith]).
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
355 N.E.2d 296, 39 N.Y.2d 1005, 387 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-etson-ny-1976.