People v. Etson

355 N.E.2d 296, 39 N.Y.2d 1005, 387 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2940
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 8, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant did not, either at the sentencing hearing or on any other occasion, claim that he aided any prosecution efforts and, indeed, there is no such evidence. Hence, he may not obtain relief under the ameliorative provisions of paragraph (b) of subdivision 1 of section 65.00 of the Penal Law. In any event, any such claim would prove unavailing (People v Eason, 40 NY2d 297 [decided herewith]).

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Etson, 355 N.E.2d 296, 39 N.Y.2d 1005, 387 N.Y.S.2d 242, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2940 (N.Y. 1976).

355 N.E.2d 296 (People v. Etson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lofton
58 A.D.2d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)