People v. Etheridge
This text of 128 A.D.3d 1087 (People v. Etheridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Wong, J.), rendered September 23, 2013, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Kohm, J.), upon a finding that she violated a condition thereof, upon her admission, and imposing an indeterminate sentence of 4 to 12 years of imprisonment upon her previous conviction of grand larceny in the second degree.
*1088 Ordered that the amended judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence imposed from an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 4 to 12 years to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2 to 6 years; as so modified, the amended judgment is affirmed.
The sentence imposed upon the revocation of probation was excessive to the extent indicated herein (see People v Delaney, 89 AD2d 872 [1982]; People v Williams, 76 AD2d 914 [1980]; People v Green, 75 AD2d 625 [1980]).
In light of our determination, we need not reach the defendant’s remaining contentions. Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 A.D.3d 1087, 8 N.Y.S.3d 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-etheridge-nyappdiv-2015.