People v. Estrada
This text of 285 A.D.2d 612 (People v. Estrada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), rendered June 4, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt on the charge of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
However, as the People correctly concede, under the circumstances of this case, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree is a lesser-included offense of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree. Accordingly, the defendant’s conviction on that lesser-included offense must be vacated (see, People v Cureton, 268 AD2d 532; People v Queen, 258 AD2d 480). Santucci, J. P., Goldstein, Florio and Crane, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
285 A.D.2d 612, 728 N.Y.S.2d 378, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-estrada-nyappdiv-2001.