People v. Estrada

192 A.D.2d 495, 597 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4397
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Estrada. Read the opinion of the Court — 173 A.D.2d 555

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered January 18, 1990, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

In the absence of additional facts that might have been developed had a motion been made pursuant to CPL 440.10, we cannot conclude that defendant’s counsel was ineffective on this record, merely because counsel, faced with overwhelming evidence of guilt, presented a risky defense (People v Love, 57 NY2d 998). Accordingly, defendant has failed to show that any possible improper actions on the part of his attorney prejudiced the outcome of the trial (People v Mackey, 155 AD2d 297).

We have considered defendant’s remaining claims, including those raised in his pro se supplemental brief, and find them to be without merit. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Asch and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Estrada, 192 A.D.2d 495, 597 N.Y.S.2d 668, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4397 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

192 A.D.2d 495 (People v. Estrada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Love
443 N.E.2d 486 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Mackey
155 A.D.2d 297 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)