People v. Estrada
This text of 244 N.E.2d 57 (People v. Estrada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Judges Burice, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen. Chief Judge Fuld dissents and votes to reverse and to reinstate the order of Criminal Term granting defendant’s motion to suppress on the ground that a person charged with possession of contraband at the time of an unlawful search and seizure is necessarily a ‘ ‘ person * * * aggrieved” (Code Crim. Pro., § 813-c) by such illegal conduct even though he may not have had physical custody of the property. (See Jones v. United States, 362 U. S. 257, 263-264.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 N.E.2d 57, 23 N.Y.2d 719, 296 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-estrada-ny-1968.