Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Estrada

People v. Estrada

244 N.E.2d 57, 23 N.Y.2d 719, 296 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 990
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 27, 1968·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Judges Burice, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen. Chief Judge Fuld dissents and votes to reverse and to reinstate the order of Criminal Term granting defendant’s motion to suppress on the ground that a person charged with possession of contraband at the time of an unlawful search and seizure is necessarily a ‘ ‘ person * * * aggrieved” (Code Crim. Pro., § 813-c) by such illegal conduct even though he may not have had physical custody of the property. (See Jones v. United States, 362 U. S. 257, 263-264.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Estrada, 244 N.E.2d 57, 23 N.Y.2d 719, 296 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 990 (N.Y. 1968).

244 N.E.2d 57 (People v. Estrada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Plevy
417 N.E.2d 518 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
L.J.M. Venture No. 1 v. Joy
105 Misc. 2d 291 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Tejada v. Christian
71 A.D.2d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
People v. Hansen
339 N.E.2d 873 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)