People v. Estrada

California Court of Appeal

People v. Estrada

133 Cal. App. 439

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 26, 1933

DocketCrim. No. 1260

StatusPublished

This text of 133 Cal. App. 439 (People v. Estrada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Estrada, 133 Cal. App. 439 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

PULLEN, P. J.

Defendant was accused of the crime of robbery and by a jury found guilty of robbery of the second degree. In due time this appeal was taken and the cause submitted.

The transcript of the evidence is brief. But three witnesses were called, the complaining witness, the arresting officer and an eye-witness to the commission of the crime.

We find no errors nor was any particular point of law presented or argued during the trial. An examination [440]*440of the record discloses no error in the proceedings nor does counsel indicate anything justifying a reversal.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

Thompson, J., and Plummer, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PULLEN, P. J.

Defendant was accused of the crime of robbery and by a jury found guilty of robbery of the second degree. In due time this appeal was taken and the cause submitted.

The transcript of the evidence is brief. But three witnesses were called, the complaining witness, the arresting officer and an eye-witness to the commission of the crime.

We find no errors nor was any particular point of law presented or argued during the trial. An examination [440]*440of the record discloses no error in the proceedings nor does counsel indicate anything justifying a reversal.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

Thompson, J., and Plummer, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 Cal. App. 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-estrada-calctapp-1933.