People v. Estela

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Estela

80 A.D.3d 526, 914 N.Y.S.2d 893

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 25, 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Order, Supreme [527]*527Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J.), entered on or about March 24, 2010, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.46 motion for resentencing, unanimously affirmed.

The court considered the appropriate factors and properly exercised its discretion in denying resentencing. Given defendant’s extensive criminal record, the serious infraction he committed while incarcerated and his history of absconding, the court properly concluded that substantial justice dictated denial of the motion (see e.g. People v Hidalgo, 47 AD3d 455 [2008]). Concur — Saxe, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme [527]*527Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J.), entered on or about March 24, 2010, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.46 motion for resentencing, unanimously affirmed.

The court considered the appropriate factors and properly exercised its discretion in denying resentencing. Given defendant’s extensive criminal record, the serious infraction he committed while incarcerated and his history of absconding, the court properly concluded that substantial justice dictated denial of the motion (see e.g. People v Hidalgo, 47 AD3d 455 [2008]). Concur — Saxe, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.

People v. Estela, 80 A.D.3d 526, 914 N.Y.S.2d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

80 A.D.3d 526 (People v. Estela) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related