People v. Esson

2024 NY Slip Op 01559
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 20, 2024
DocketInd. No. 266/21
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 01559 (People v. Esson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Esson, 2024 NY Slip Op 01559 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People v Esson (2024 NY Slip Op 01559)
People v Esson
2024 NY Slip Op 01559
Decided on March 20, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 20, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
BARRY E. WARHIT
CARL J. LANDICINO, JJ.

2022-09875
(Ind. No. 266/21)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Jonathan Esson, appellant.


David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Goshen, NY (Robert H. Middlemiss of counsel), for respondent.

Alex Smith, Middletown, NY, for appellant.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (William L. DeProspo, J.), rendered November 15, 2022, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 257; People v Coplin, 194 AD3d 739). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court adequately explained, and the defendant acknowledged that he understood, the separate and distinct nature of the waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Headley, 197 AD3d 1329, 1330; People v Miles, 189 AD3d 890, 891). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contentions that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Coplin, 194 AD3d 739) and that the sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment (see People v Yakubov, 204 AD3d 1043, 1044).

DILLON, J.P., CONNOLLY, WARHIT and LANDICINO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Miles
2020 NY Slip Op 07225 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Coplin
2021 NY Slip Op 02815 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Headley
2021 NY Slip Op 05131 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Yakubov
165 N.Y.S.3d 355 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 01559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-esson-nyappdiv-2024.