People v. Essner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Essner

240 A.D. 1010

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1933·Published

Opinion

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Queens county reversed on the law and a new trial ordered. In our opiMon, the testimony of Officer Rockee as to the appellant’s plea of guilty of attempted grand larceny in the Kings County Court, appearmg at folios 325 and 326, was incompetent and prejudicial to the appellant. (People v. Cardillo, 207 N. Y. 70.) We have examined the record and find no error as to the facts. Young, Kapper and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., concur in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Queens county reversed on the law and a new trial ordered. In our opiMon, the testimony of Officer Rockee as to the appellant’s plea of guilty of attempted grand larceny in the Kings County Court, appearmg at folios 325 and 326, was incompetent and prejudicial to the appellant. (People v. Cardillo, 207 N. Y. 70.) We have examined the record and find no error as to the facts. Young, Kapper and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., concur in result.

People v. Essner, 240 A.D. 1010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

240 A.D. 1010 (People v. Essner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related