People v. Essner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Essner

240 A.D. 1010

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 1010 (People v. Essner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Essner, 240 A.D. 1010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Queens county reversed on the law and a new trial ordered. In our opiMon, the testimony of Officer Rockee as to the appellant’s plea of guilty of attempted grand larceny in the Kings County Court, appearmg at folios 325 and 326, was incompetent and prejudicial to the appellant. (People v. Cardillo, 207 N. Y. 70.) We have examined the record and find no error as to the facts. Young, Kapper and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., concur in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Queens county reversed on the law and a new trial ordered. In our opiMon, the testimony of Officer Rockee as to the appellant’s plea of guilty of attempted grand larceny in the Kings County Court, appearmg at folios 325 and 326, was incompetent and prejudicial to the appellant. (People v. Cardillo, 207 N. Y. 70.) We have examined the record and find no error as to the facts. Young, Kapper and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., concur in result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 1010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-essner-nyappdiv-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack