People v. Essig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Essig

151 A.D.2d 1017, 544 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8362

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 151 A.D.2d 1017 (People v. Essig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Essig, 151 A.D.2d 1017, 544 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8362 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude from our review of the record that the suppression court correctly found that the pretrial photographic identification procedures used by the police were not impermissibly suggestive (see, Simmons v United States, 390 US 377, 384-386). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — rape, first degree.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude from our review of the record that the suppression court correctly found that the pretrial photographic identification procedures used by the police were not impermissibly suggestive (see, Simmons v United States, 390 US 377, 384-386). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — rape, first degree.) Present —Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 A.D.2d 1017, 544 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-essig-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack