People v. Esquilin

2021 NY Slip Op 01589, 140 N.Y.S.3d 796, 192 A.D.3d 1481
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 19, 2021
Docket211 KA 16-02078
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 01589 (People v. Esquilin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Esquilin, 2021 NY Slip Op 01589, 140 N.Y.S.3d 796, 192 A.D.3d 1481 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v Esquilin (2021 NY Slip Op 01589)
People v Esquilin
2021 NY Slip Op 01589
Decided on March 19, 2021
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 19, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., NEMOYER, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

211 KA 16-02078

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

FELIX ESQUILIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (BENJAMIN L. NELSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Joanne M. Winslow, J.), rendered September 13, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree (Penal Law

§ 120.10 [1]). As the People correctly concede, defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid. Supreme Court's oral colloquy and the written waiver of the right to appeal provided defendant with erroneous information about the scope of the waiver and failed to identify that certain rights would survive the waiver (see People v Bisono, — NY3d &mdash, &mdash, 2020 NY Slip Op 07484, *2 [2020]; People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 564-567 [2019], cert denied — US &mdash, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]). Nevertheless, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: March 19, 2021

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Desjardins
2021 NY Slip Op 04465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 01589, 140 N.Y.S.3d 796, 192 A.D.3d 1481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-esquilin-nyappdiv-2021.