Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Esquilin

People v. Esquilin

691 N.E.2d 1024, 91 N.Y.2d 902, 668 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 3
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 11, 1998·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

As there was evidence to support the lower courts’ determination that the police possessed a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity justifying the pursuit of defendant (see, People v Sierra, 83 NY2d 928), the issue is beyond this Court’s further review.

Defendant’s remaining contention that the trial court violated CPL 310.30 by failing to properly respond to a jury question is without merit.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Esquilin, 691 N.E.2d 1024, 91 N.Y.2d 902, 668 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 3 (N.Y. 1998).

691 N.E.2d 1024 (People v. Esquilin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Parker
32 N.Y.3d 49 (New York Court of Appeals, 2018)
TORRES, THOMAS J., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
People v. Torres
125 A.D.3d 1481 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Matter of Shariff H.
123 A.D.3d 714 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Woods
290 A.D.2d 346 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Smalls
259 A.D.2d 336 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Rivera
249 A.D.2d 208 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)