People v. Esquilin
This text of 691 N.E.2d 1024 (People v. Esquilin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
As there was evidence to support the lower courts’ determination that the police possessed a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity justifying the pursuit of defendant (see, People v Sierra, 83 NY2d 928), the issue is beyond this Court’s further review.
Defendant’s remaining contention that the trial court violated CPL 310.30 by failing to properly respond to a jury question is without merit.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
691 N.E.2d 1024, 91 N.Y.2d 902, 668 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-esquilin-ny-1998.