People v. Espinal

2020 NY Slip Op 428, 179 A.D.3d 945, 114 N.Y.S.3d 249
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Espinal. Read the opinion of the Court — 2021 NY Slip Op 02075
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 22, 2020·No. 2017-06793·Published

Opinion

People v Espinal (2020 NY Slip Op 00428)
People v Espinal
2020 NY Slip Op 00428
Decided on January 22, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 22, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RUTH C. BALKIN, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
JEFFREY A. COHEN
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2017-06793
2017-06794

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Elisaldo Espinal, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 1214/16, 1900/17)


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Kendra L. Hutchinson of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (William Miller, J.), both rendered June 1, 2017, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree under Indictment No. 1214/16 and grand larceny in the fourth degree under Indictment No. 1900/17, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, COHEN and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Espinal, 2020 NY Slip Op 428, 179 A.D.3d 945, 114 N.Y.S.3d 249 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

2020 NY Slip Op 428 (People v. Espinal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re Giovanni S.
89 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)