People v. Escobar

111 A.D.2d 829, 490 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50074

This text of 111 A.D.2d 829 (People v. Escobar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Escobar, 111 A.D.2d 829, 490 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50074 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from three [830]*830judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), all rendered July 21, 1980, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts) and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 A.D.2d 829, 490 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-escobar-nyappdiv-1985.