People v. Escobar

111 A.D.2d 829, 490 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50074
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Escobar. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 A.D.2d 500

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from three [830]*830judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), all rendered July 21, 1980, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts) and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Escobar, 111 A.D.2d 829, 490 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50074 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

111 A.D.2d 829 (People v. Escobar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)