People v. Esco
This text of 103 A.D.3d 917 (People v. Esco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Capeci, J.), rendered May 9, 2011, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made because he was not advised, prior to entering his plea of guilty, that his sentence would include a five-year period of postrelease supervision which was thereafter imposed at sentencing. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record reveals that the court advised the defendant at the outset of the plea proceedings that his sentence would include a five-year period of postrelease supervision (cf. People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 245 [2005]). Accordingly, the defendant is not entitled to vacate his plea on this ground. Skelos, J.P., Chambers, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 A.D.3d 917, 959 N.Y.S.2d 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-esco-nyappdiv-2013.