People v. Escaloria

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Escaloria

119 A.D.3d 707, 988 N.Y.S.2d 892

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 9, 2014·No. 2012-07408·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mondo, J.), rendered June 26, 2012, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the forfeiture of United States currency in the sum of $10, to which he agreed as a condition of the subject negotiated plea agreement, is without merit (see CPL 220.50 [6]; see generally People v Abruzzese, 30 AD3d 219, 220 [2006]; People v Sczepankowski, 293 AD2d 212, 214 [2002]).

Rivera, J.P, Balkin, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mondo, J.), rendered June 26, 2012, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the forfeiture of United States currency in the sum of $10, to which he agreed as a condition of the subject negotiated plea agreement, is without merit (see CPL 220.50 [6]; see generally People v Abruzzese, 30 AD3d 219, 220 [2006]; People v Sczepankowski, 293 AD2d 212, 214 [2002]).

Rivera, J.P, Balkin, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.

People v. Escaloria, 119 A.D.3d 707, 988 N.Y.S.2d 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

119 A.D.3d 707 (People v. Escaloria) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related