People v. Erwin

4 Denio 129
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1847
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 4 Denio 129 (People v. Erwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Erwin, 4 Denio 129 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In misdemeanors there are no accessories, as there are in felonies; but all the guilty actors, whether present or absent at the time the offence was committed, are principals; and should be indicted as such. In Brockway v. The People this rule was not followed. The defendant was indicted for demising his house to be kept as a common bawdy house, when the charge should have been, that he kept the house. This fault in the indictment was noticed in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Cowen; and although not expressly mentioned in the opinion of Chief Justice Nelson, it was the ground on which the present chief justice concurred in the judgment which was rendered. In this case, the owner of the property, as well as the woman, has been directly charged with keeping the house. The indictment is right; and we think the instruction given to the jury was substantially correct. The man who demises a house to be kept as a disorderly house, and which is so kept with his knowledge—especially where, as in this case, he derives a profit from that mode of using the property—may well be called the keeper of the house, and be punished as such.

New trial denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ciancanelli
45 P.3d 451 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)
United States v. Sumner
125 Misc. 658 (New York Supreme Court, 1925)
Griffin v. People
44 Colo. 533 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1908)
People v. Trainor
57 A.D. 422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)
Plath v. Kline
18 A.D. 240 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Commonwealth v. Ahearn
35 N.E. 853 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1894)
People v. O'Melia
22 N.Y.S. 465 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Commonwealth v. Brown
13 L.R.A. 195 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1891)
People v. Clark
14 N.Y.S. 642 (Court Of Oyer And Terminer New York, 1891)
Berning v. State
51 Ark. 550 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1889)
O'Brien v. Greenbaum
1 Silv. Sup. 56 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)
Joyce v. Martin
10 A. 620 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1887)
Crocker v. State
49 Ark. 60 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1886)
Troutman v. State
6 A. 618 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1886)
The People v. . Lyon
1 N.E. 673 (New York Court of Appeals, 1885)
People v. Lyon
2 N.Y. Crim. 484 (New York Supreme Court, 1884)
Marsan v. French
61 Tex. 173 (Texas Supreme Court, 1884)
Commonwealth v. Churchill
136 Mass. 148 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1883)
People v. Lyon
1 N.Y. Crim. 400 (Court Of Oyer And Terminer New York, 1883)
Territory v. Stone
2 Dakota 155 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Denio 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-erwin-nysupct-1847.