People v. Epakchi
This text of 31 N.Y.3d 1007 (People v. Epakchi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
People v Epakchi (2018 NY Slip Op 03095)
| People v Epakchi |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 03095 [31 NY3d 1007] |
| May 1, 2018 |
| Court of Appeals |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| As corrected through Wednesday, June 13, 2018 |
[*1]
| The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Daria N. Epakchi, Respondent. |
Decided May 1, 2018
People v Epakchi, 52 Misc 3d 134(A), 2016 NY Slip Op 51020(U), reversed.
Suffolk County Traffic Prosecutor's Office, Hauppauge (Justin W. Smiloff of counsel), for appellant.
Law Offices of David A. Day, P.C., Glen Cove (David A. Day of counsel), for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, and case remitted to the Appellate Term, Second Department, Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, for further proceedings. Because the case originated in a local criminal court and the proceedings were not transcribed by a court stenographer, the appeal was not properly taken due to the failure to serve or file an affidavit of errors (see CPL 460.10 [3]).
Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 N.Y.3d 1007, 2018 NY Slip Op 03095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-epakchi-ny-2018.