People v. Enrique
This text of 600 N.E.2d 229 (People v. Enrique) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. We agree with the Appellate Division, for the reasons stated by Justice Sullivan (see, 165 AD2d 13), that the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights under the United States Constitution were not abridged by the court’s ruling that defense counsel could not confer with his client during a luncheon recess. Nor do we perceive any basis for a different result under the State Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
600 N.E.2d 229, 80 N.Y.2d 869, 587 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-enrique-ny-1992.