People v. English

New York Court of Appeals

People v. English

209 N.E.2d 722, 16 N.Y.2d 719, 262 N.Y.S.2d 104, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1195

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 9, 1965

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 209 N.E.2d 722 (People v. English) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. English, 209 N.E.2d 722, 16 N.Y.2d 719, 262 N.Y.S.2d 104, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1195 (N.Y. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment modified to the extent of reversing the conviction for and dismissing the counts of the indictment relating to the alleged crimes of attempted rape and assault with intent to commit rape on the ground of a lack of the corroboration required by law for such convictions when testimony as to an actual rape has been received; and, as so modified, affirmed (see People v. Lo Verde, 7 N Y 2d 114).

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis and Bergan. Judges Dye, Burke and Scileppi dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment modified to the extent of reversing the conviction for and dismissing the counts of the indictment relating to the alleged crimes of attempted rape and assault with intent to commit rape on the ground of a lack of the corroboration required by law for such convictions when testimony as to an actual rape has been received; and, as so modified, affirmed (see People v. Lo Verde, 7 N Y 2d 114).

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis and Bergan. Judges Dye, Burke and Scileppi dissent and vote to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 N.E.2d 722, 16 N.Y.2d 719, 262 N.Y.S.2d 104, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-english-ny-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack