People v. English
This text of 743 N.W.2d 909 (People v. English) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Warren Edward ENGLISH, III, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*910 On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2007 judgment and order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to reinstate bond is DENIED.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would remand this case to the trial court for reconsideration under the appropriate standard, as explained in the partially dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, of whether the juror was excusable for cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
743 N.W.2d 909, 480 Mich. 1060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-english-mich-2008.