People v. English
52 Cal. 212
Opinion
The evidence of the declaration of Turner, made after the alleged offense was fully consummated, was not admissible against English, the only defendant on trial. (1 Bishop Grim.. Proc. sec. igi.)
Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. English, 52 Cal. 212 (Cal. 1877).
52 Cal. 212 (People v. English) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Ayhens
117 P. 789 (California Court of Appeal, 1911)
People v. Sidelinger
99 P. 390 (California Court of Appeal, 1908)
State v. Hinkle
54 P. 155 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1898)
People v. Brady
36 P. 949 (California Supreme Court, 1894)
People v. Irwin
20 P. 56 (California Supreme Court, 1888)
People v. Gonzales
12 P. 783 (California Supreme Court, 1887)
Durkee v. Central Pacific Railroad
9 P. 99 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
Sheppard v. Yocum
10 Or. 402 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1882)
People v. Aleck
61 Cal. 137 (California Supreme Court, 1882)