People v. Engargola
This text of 255 A.D. 980 (People v. Engargola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the County Court of Kings county, convicting defendant of the crime of assault in the second degree, reversed on the law and a new trial ordered. The court erred in its charge in the observations made preliminarily to the instructions respecting self-defense at folio 462, and in its charge respecting the effect of the giving of false testimony by a witness, at folio 468. These errors may not be overlooked as not being prejudicial, even though the record contains an ample basis for the jury’s verdict of conviction. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 A.D. 980, 8 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-engargola-nyappdiv-1938.