People v. Emnino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Emnino

12 A.D.2d 962, 214 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12771

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 962 (People v. Emnino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Emnino, 12 A.D.2d 962, 214 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from an order of the County Court, Kings County, dated April 20, 1960, denying, without a hearing, his coram nobis application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered October 29, 1946, convicting him on three separate counts of grand larceny in the first degree, and imposing sentence. The ground for the application is that the trial court failed to comply with section 433 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in that, when the jury was brought into court to report the verdict, their names were not called. Order affirmed (People v. Marilla, 7 N Y 2d 319; People ex rel. Meers v. Martin, 4 A D 2d 659, affd. 4 N Y 2d 898; People v. Romano, 11 A D 2d 1076). Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from an order of the County Court, Kings County, dated April 20, 1960, denying, without a hearing, his coram nobis application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered October 29, 1946, convicting him on three separate counts of grand larceny in the first degree, and imposing sentence. The ground for the application is that the trial court failed to comply with section 433 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in that, when the jury was brought into court to report the verdict, their names were not called. Order affirmed (People v. Marilla, 7 N Y 2d 319; People ex rel. Meers v. Martin, 4 A D 2d 659, affd. 4 N Y 2d 898; People v. Romano, 11 A D 2d 1076). Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 962, 214 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-emnino-nyappdiv-1961.