People v. Emmons

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Emmons

162 N.W.2d 117, 11 Mich. App. 660

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 25, 1987

DocketDocket 4,087

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 162 N.W.2d 117 (People v. Emmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Emmons, 162 N.W.2d 117, 11 Mich. App. 660 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

T. G. Kavanagh, J.

On leave granted, Donald Emmons appeals his conviction of the crime of perjury. CL 1948, § 750.423 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.665). Emmons executed an assumed name certificate pursuant to CLS 1961, § 445.1 (Stat Ann’-1964 Rev § 19.821), and in the presence of a notary public he falsely signed the name “Donald Walker” at the bottom of the certificate and acknowledged that he had executed it. The notary testified, at the trial, that before she signed as notary Emmons swore to the truth of the statements made in the certificate. It is this oath, before the notary, upon which the perjury charge was based. The crime of perjury under our statute, supra, is not committed' unless the oath is one that is authorized or required by law. People v. Fox (1872), 25 Mich 492, Beecher v. Anderson (1881), 45 Mich 543. That Emmons did in fact swear falsely as to the truth of the certificate is of no significance if the oath was not required or authorized. See People v. Gaige (1872), 26 Mich 29 and Metzger v. Fire Assurance Co. (1894), 102 Mich 334. We hold that Emmons’ conviction must be set aside because neither the assumed name statute, supra, nor the form provided pursuant • thereto authorizes or requires an oath as to the truth of the certificate.

Reversed.

Quinn, P. J., and Gorkin, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

T. G. Kavanagh, J.

On leave granted, Donald Emmons appeals his conviction of the crime of perjury. CL 1948, § 750.423 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.665). Emmons executed an assumed name certificate pursuant to CLS 1961, § 445.1 (Stat Ann’-1964 Rev § 19.821), and in the presence of a notary public he falsely signed the name “Donald Walker” at the bottom of the certificate and acknowledged that he had executed it. The notary testified, at the trial, that before she signed as notary Emmons swore to the truth of the statements made in the certificate. It is this oath, before the notary, upon which the perjury charge was based. The crime of perjury under our statute, supra, is not committed' unless the oath is one that is authorized or required by law. People v. Fox (1872), 25 Mich 492, Beecher v. Anderson (1881), 45 Mich 543. That Emmons did in fact swear falsely as to the truth of the certificate is of no significance if the oath was not required or authorized. See People v. Gaige (1872), 26 Mich 29 and Metzger v. Fire Assurance Co. (1894), 102 Mich 334. We hold that Emmons’ conviction must be set aside because neither the assumed name statute, supra, nor the form provided pursuant • thereto authorizes or requires an oath as to the truth of the certificate.

Reversed.

Quinn, P. J., and Gorkin, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 N.W.2d 117, 11 Mich. App. 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-emmons-michctapp-1987.

Opinion

T. G. Kavanagh, J.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack