People v. Emig

Supreme Court of Colorado

People v. Emig

552 P.2d 312, 191 Colo. 223, 1976 Colo. LEXIS 605

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedJuly 6, 1976

DocketNo. 27249

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 552 P.2d 312 (People v. Emig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Emig, 552 P.2d 312, 191 Colo. 223, 1976 Colo. LEXIS 605 (Colo. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

MR. JUSTICE GROVES

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The defendant was convicted of fraud by check under section 18-5-205, C.R.S. 1973, and was sentenced to a term in the state penitentiary.

In People v. Quinn, 190 Colo. 534, 549 P.2d 1332, and People v. Reagan, 190 Colo. 534, 549 P.2d 1332, both announced May 10, 1976, we held section (2) of this statute to be unconstitutional. As a result, the Attorney General has properly confessed error as to the instant convictions. He asks, however, that under White v. District Court, 180 Colo. 147, 503 P.2d 340 (1972), we declare that the defendant can be prosecuted under a former statute, 1967 Perm. Supp., C.R.S. 1963, 40-14-20.

In the Attorney General’s petition for rehearing in People v. Quinn, supra, and People v. Reagan, supra, he requested precisely the same ruling as asked here. We denied the petition for rehearing in Quinn and Reagan.

In People v. Vinnola, 177 Colo. 405, 494 P.2d 826 (1972), we declared unconstitutional the then bad check statute, C.R.S. 1963, 40-14-20, as amended by Colo. Sess. Laws, 1970, ch. 48 at 158. Thereafter, in the action represented by White v. District Court, supra, the defendant was charged and prosecuted under the previous bad check statute, 1965 Perm. Supp., C.R.S. 1963, 40-14-10, which had been repealed by the statute which we declared unconstitutional in Vinnola. In White we upheld the validity of the prosecution under the last cited statute.

Here, in advance of any prosecution under a statute in effect prior to the one declared unconstitutional in Quinn and Reagan, the Attorney General seeks an advisory ruling. We then concluded that we should not give such a ruling, and we still adhere to that conclusion.

The judgments under the fraud by check counts are reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the charges.

MR. JUSTICE HODGES does not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MR. JUSTICE GROVES

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The defendant was convicted of fraud by check under section 18-5-205, C.R.S. 1973, and was sentenced to a term in the state penitentiary.

In People v. Quinn, 190 Colo. 534, 549 P.2d 1332, and People v. Reagan, 190 Colo. 534, 549 P.2d 1332, both announced May 10, 1976, we held section (2) of this statute to be unconstitutional. As a result, the Attorney General has properly confessed error as to the instant convictions. He asks, however, that under White v. District Court, 180 Colo. 147, 503 P.2d 340 (1972), we declare that the defendant can be prosecuted under a former statute, 1967 Perm. Supp., C.R.S. 1963, 40-14-20.

In the Attorney General’s petition for rehearing in People v. Quinn, supra, and People v. Reagan, supra, he requested precisely the same ruling as asked here. We denied the petition for rehearing in Quinn and Reagan.

In People v. Vinnola, 177 Colo. 405, 494 P.2d 826 (1972), we declared unconstitutional the then bad check statute, C.R.S. 1963, 40-14-20, as amended by Colo. Sess. Laws, 1970, ch. 48 at 158. Thereafter, in the action represented by White v. District Court, supra, the defendant was charged and prosecuted under the previous bad check statute, 1965 Perm. Supp., C.R.S. 1963, 40-14-10, which had been repealed by the statute which we declared unconstitutional in Vinnola. In White we upheld the validity of the prosecution under the last cited statute.

Here, in advance of any prosecution under a statute in effect prior to the one declared unconstitutional in Quinn and Reagan, the Attorney General seeks an advisory ruling. We then concluded that we should not give such a ruling, and we still adhere to that conclusion.

The judgments under the fraud by check counts are reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the charges.

MR. JUSTICE HODGES does not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

552 P.2d 312, 191 Colo. 223, 1976 Colo. LEXIS 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-emig-colo-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack