People v. Ellman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ellman

71 A.D.2d 1029, 420 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13384

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 28, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 71 A.D.2d 1029 (People v. Ellman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ellman, 71 A.D.2d 1029, 420 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13384 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeals by defendants from two judgments (one as to each of them) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, both rendered September 26, 1978, convicting each of them, inter alia, of grand larceny in the second degree, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (three counts) and conspiracy in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgments affirmed. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). There was sufficient evidence in the [1030]*1030record to sustain the jury’s verdict that the defendants knowingly and intentionally committed the acts in question. Moreover, under the circumstances herein, we do not believe that the sentences imposed were excessive. We have considered the other points raised by the defendants and have found them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Mangano and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeals by defendants from two judgments (one as to each of them) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, both rendered September 26, 1978, convicting each of them, inter alia, of grand larceny in the second degree, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (three counts) and conspiracy in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgments affirmed. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). There was sufficient evidence in the [1030]*1030record to sustain the jury’s verdict that the defendants knowingly and intentionally committed the acts in question. Moreover, under the circumstances herein, we do not believe that the sentences imposed were excessive. We have considered the other points raised by the defendants and have found them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Mangano and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.2d 1029, 420 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ellman-nyappdiv-1979.