People v. Ellison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ellison

237 A.D.2d 531, 656 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2822

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 24, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), imposed May 24, 1995, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal on the ground that the sentence was excessive cannot be deemed knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see, People v Rolon, 220 AD2d 543). We have considered the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive, and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), imposed May 24, 1995, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal on the ground that the sentence was excessive cannot be deemed knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see, People v Rolon, 220 AD2d 543). We have considered the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive, and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.

People v. Ellison, 237 A.D.2d 531, 656 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

237 A.D.2d 531 (People v. Ellison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related