People v. Ellison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ellison

197 A.D.2d 737, 602 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9060

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 7, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 197 A.D.2d 737 (People v. Ellison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ellison, 197 A.D.2d 737, 602 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9060 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), rendered January 25, 1993, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree.

Defendant contends on this appeal that the sentence of 1 to 7 years’ imprisonment that she received upon her guilty plea is harsh and excessive. Defendant was allowed to plead guilty to sexual abuse in the first degree in satisfaction of a 15-count indictment against her which included more serious charges and pleaded guilty knowing that she could receive the sentence ultimately imposed. Further, the sentence was less than the harshest possible. Upon reviewing the record, we find no basis to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court (see, People v Tranka, 191 AD2d 903; People v Gonzalez, 178 AD2d 850, lv denied 79 NY2d 948).

Weiss, P. J., Mercure, Cardona, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), rendered January 25, 1993, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree.

Defendant contends on this appeal that the sentence of 1 to 7 years’ imprisonment that she received upon her guilty plea is harsh and excessive. Defendant was allowed to plead guilty to sexual abuse in the first degree in satisfaction of a 15-count indictment against her which included more serious charges and pleaded guilty knowing that she could receive the sentence ultimately imposed. Further, the sentence was less than the harshest possible. Upon reviewing the record, we find no basis to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court (see, People v Tranka, 191 AD2d 903; People v Gonzalez, 178 AD2d 850, lv denied 79 NY2d 948).

Weiss, P. J., Mercure, Cardona, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 A.D.2d 737, 602 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ellison-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack