People v. Ellis

15 Wend. 371
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1836·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Nelson. J.

In the case of The People v. Olcott, 2 Johns. Cas. 307, the power of the court as to the withdrawal of a juror after the jury was impannelled and sworn, [372] in the case of a misdemeanor, seems to be put on the same f00t¡ng ag ;n civil cases, in which it rests very much in the exercise of a sound discretion. 8 Cowen, 127. The same indulgence is not extended in this court to all criminal cases not capital, The People v. Barrett & Ward, 2 Caines, 304, though respectable authorities have gone that length. 2 Gall. 364. We see no good objection to the application of the rule in all cases of misdemeanor.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ellis, 15 Wend. 371 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1836).

15 Wend. 371 (People v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Polk v. Johnson
177 N.W.2d 122 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1970)
Wabash Railroad v. McCormick
55 N.E. 251 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1899)
Planer v. Smith
40 Wis. 31 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1876)
Glendening v. Canary
5 Daly 489 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1875)
Schofield v. Settley
31 Ill. 515 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1863)
Miller v. Metzger
16 Ill. 390 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1855)
People v. Olcott
2 Johns. Cas. 301 (New York Supreme Court, 1801)