People v. Ellis

114 A.D.3d 961, 980 N.Y.S.2d 832
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ellis. Read the opinion of the Court — 142 A.D.3d 509

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garnett, J.), rendered February 1, 2011, convicting her of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in permitting the People to present rebuttal testimony (see People v Hay, 73 AD3d 1081 [2010]; People v Grindley, 243 AD2d 580 [1997]; People v Castillo, 215 AD2d 575 [1995]).

The defendant’s contention that she did not receive the effective assistance of counsel is without merit (see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit. Skelos, J.E, Chambers, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ellis, 114 A.D.3d 961, 980 N.Y.S.2d 832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

114 A.D.3d 961 (People v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Hay
73 A.D.3d 1081 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Castillo
215 A.D.2d 575 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Grindley
243 A.D.2d 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)