People v. Ellis

67 A.D.3d 980, 888 N.Y.S.2d 756
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ellis. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 A.D.3d 1433

Opinion

by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County [981]*981(Rienzi, J.), dated November 8, 2007, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the People established, by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]), that he inflicted a “physical injury” upon the victim (Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; see People v Sullivan, 64 AD3d 67, 74 [2009]; People v Fisher, 22 AD3d 358 [2005]; People v Tomczak, 189 AD2d 926, 927 [1993]; cf. People v Chiddick, 8 NY3d 445, 447-448 [2007]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly assessed 15 points for risk factor 1 based upon the defendant’s use of violence, and properly designated the defendant a level three sex offender. Fisher, J.P., Covello, Santucci and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ellis, 67 A.D.3d 980, 888 N.Y.S.2d 756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

67 A.D.3d 980 (People v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Chiddick
866 N.E.2d 1039 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Fisher
22 A.D.3d 358 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Sullivan
64 A.D.3d 67 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Tomczak
189 A.D.2d 926 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)