People v. Ellis

306 A.D.2d 539, 761 N.Y.S.2d 854
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ellis. Read the opinion of the Court — 4 A.D.3d 877

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges J.), rendered October 31, 2001, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he waived his right to be present at sidebar discussions prior to the commencement of the voir dire of prospective jurors, and that the waiver was made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see People v Keen, 94 NY2d 533, 538-539 [2000]; People v Vargas, 88 NY2d 363, 375 [1996]; People v Antommarchi, 80 NY2d 247, 250 [1992]; People v Velasquez, 298 AD2d 608 [2002]; People v Derti, 285 AD2d 611 [2001]; People v Tappin, 264 AD2d 449 [1999]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, does not require reversal. Prudenti, P.J., Altman, Smith and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ellis, 306 A.D.2d 539, 761 N.Y.S.2d 854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

306 A.D.2d 539 (People v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Keen
728 N.E.2d 979 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
People v. Vargas
668 N.E.2d 879 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
People v. Antommarchi
604 N.E.2d 95 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Tappin
264 A.D.2d 449 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Derti
285 A.D.2d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Velasquez
298 A.D.2d 608 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)