People v. Elliott
196 N.W.2d 12, 38 Mich. App. 261
Opinion
Defendant was tried and convicted of uttering and publishing a forged instrument and appeals. A motion to affirm has been filed by the people.
• Upon an examination of the briefs and record, it is manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.
Motion to affirm granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Elliott, 196 N.W.2d 12, 38 Mich. App. 261 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).
196 N.W.2d 12 (People v. Elliott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.