People v. Elias
This text of 226 A.D.2d 474 (People v. Elias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), rendered April 28, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s claims of error regarding the trial court’s interested-witness charge and the portion of the charge regarding evidence of flight are not preserved for appellate review, since he neither objected to the charge as given nor requested curative instructions (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10,19; People v Nuccie, 57 NY2d 818; People v Baez, 208 AD2d 551; People v Wilson, 154 AD2d 566). In any event, the court appropriately instructed the jury on the weight to be given to the evidence of flight. The trial court’s charge that, as a matter of law, the police officers were not interested witnesses was also not erroneous (see, People v Holly, 184 AD2d 581; People v Melvin, 128 AD2d 647; People v Holmes, 117 AD2d 480).
The sentence was not excessive (see, People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Sullivan, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 A.D.2d 474, 640 N.Y.S.2d 799, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-elias-nyappdiv-1996.