People v. Eldeen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Eldeen

173 A.D.2d 342

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 173 A.D.2d 342 (People v. Eldeen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Eldeen, 173 A.D.2d 342 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Clifford A. Scott, J.), rendered December 10, 1987, convicting defendant after a jury trial of grand larceny in the fourth degree and sentencing him, as a predicate felony offender, to 2 to 4 years imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

Charged with filching money from the elderly victim’s pocket, defendant sought to impeach the testimony of a distant eyewitness who had later recorded in his notes that he had observed "what seemed like a conversation” taking place between defendant and victim, consistent with defendant’s [343]*343story that he had merely made change for the victim at the latter’s request. At trial, the eyewitness testified that other than observations of some head shaking and nodding, he did not think there had been a conversation between the two, notwithstanding what he wrote in his notes at the time.

Even if the recorded material were relevant to this crime (cf., People v Maerling, 64 NY2d 134), it was not necessarily inconsistent with the eyewitness’ testimony. Furthermore, the jury heard the contents of the witness’ notes, without restriction, both on cross-examination of the witness and during summation, so the exclusion of the written notes themselves resulted in no harm to the defense (People v Piazza, 48 NY2d 151). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Clifford A. Scott, J.), rendered December 10, 1987, convicting defendant after a jury trial of grand larceny in the fourth degree and sentencing him, as a predicate felony offender, to 2 to 4 years imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

Charged with filching money from the elderly victim’s pocket, defendant sought to impeach the testimony of a distant eyewitness who had later recorded in his notes that he had observed "what seemed like a conversation” taking place between defendant and victim, consistent with defendant’s [343]*343story that he had merely made change for the victim at the latter’s request. At trial, the eyewitness testified that other than observations of some head shaking and nodding, he did not think there had been a conversation between the two, notwithstanding what he wrote in his notes at the time.

Even if the recorded material were relevant to this crime (cf., People v Maerling, 64 NY2d 134), it was not necessarily inconsistent with the eyewitness’ testimony. Furthermore, the jury heard the contents of the witness’ notes, without restriction, both on cross-examination of the witness and during summation, so the exclusion of the written notes themselves resulted in no harm to the defense (People v Piazza, 48 NY2d 151). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 A.D.2d 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-eldeen-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack